Silver shattered records on January 14, 2026, surging past $90 per troy ounce for the first time in history. The move triggered an unprecedented response: the US Mint suspended all silver numismatic product sales, citing extreme price volatility and an inability to accurately price products. For crypto investors, the implications run deeper than a commodity rally—silver’s 195% year-over-year gain versus Bitcoin’s 7% loss is forcing a fundamental reassessment of digital assets’ role as inflation hedges and safe havens.
“This is not normal. At all,” posted market commentator Echo X on social media. “When the Mint pauses sales, it means physical demand is overwhelming the system and the paper price is no longer telling the truth. This is how every silver squeeze starts.”
Take a Break
Play Blok Match! 🎮
Test your abilities with our free crypto-themed matching game. How fast can you clear the board?
A Historic Milestone With Real-World Consequences
Silver’s journey to $90 caps an extraordinary 12 months. The metal gained 148% in 2025 alone—its best annual performance in decades—driven by a convergence of factors: industrial demand from solar panels and electric vehicles, China’s new export restrictions limiting supply, and surging safe-haven buying amid geopolitical chaos including the US operation in Venezuela and escalating tensions in Iran.
The US Mint’s sales halt marks a critical inflection point. American Silver Eagle bullion coins now trade at $98-$100 at dealers—above the Mint’s official numismatic pricing. This premium inversion, where bullion costs more than collectible versions, signals severe physical supply stress rather than speculative froth.
Analysts from Citigroup and First Majestic Silver’s CEO Keith Neumeyer project silver could exceed $100 in the coming months. Bank of America has floated targets as high as $309 per ounce, citing structural supply deficits and irreplaceable industrial demand.
The “Digital Gold” Narrative Under Pressure
Bitcoin’s struggles during silver and gold’s historic rallies challenge the cryptocurrency’s core investment thesis. While silver finished 2025 up 151% and gold gained roughly 60%, Bitcoin ended the year down 7%—its first negative annual return since 2022. More striking: Bitcoin remains approximately 30% below its October 2025 all-time high of $126,000, stuck in a $86,000-$96,000 range while precious metals set new records weekly.
“Bitcoin no longer tracks the safe-haven trade reliably,” noted analysts at FinTech Weekly. The divergence has been stark: when geopolitical risk spiked following the Venezuela intervention, gold immediately reclaimed $4,400 and silver surged 5%—but Bitcoin’s response was muted, behaving more like a risk asset than digital gold.
The numbers tell a story of capital allocation preferences. Silver’s total market capitalization has crossed $4 trillion, while Bitcoin ETF flows have turned volatile—$1.17 billion in inflows early January reversed to $1.1 billion in outflows days later. When investors sought safety, they chose physical scarcity over digital.
Why Physical Beats Digital (For Now)
The structural dynamics favoring silver illuminate crypto’s current limitations. China’s January 2026 export restrictions require government licenses for silver exports, effectively blocking small and mid-sized exporters overnight. Global supply deficits of 115-120 million ounces annually have persisted for five consecutive years. Once silver disappears into a solar panel, missile guidance system, or EV battery, it doesn’t return to the market.
“Bitcoin guys say ‘sell silver, buy Bitcoin because it’s easier to move,’” countered market commentator Wall Street Mav. “They misunderstand why silver is rising. Silver is the best conductor of electricity—it’s irreplaceable in industry. The shortage is real. Mines have been in deficit for five years, and vaults are running dry.”
This physical scarcity contrasts with crypto’s digital abundance. Bitcoin’s fixed 21 million supply cap creates programmatic scarcity, but new tokens launch daily. The crypto market’s total capitalization is distributed across thousands of assets competing for the same investment dollars—a fragmentation that silver and gold don’t face.
Litecoin’s “Digital Silver” Moment?
Silver’s rally has revived attention on Litecoin, long dubbed “digital silver” to Bitcoin’s gold. At $79-$81, Litecoin now trades remarkably close to silver’s per-ounce price—a symbolic parallel that has reignited community discussion about LTC’s positioning.
The Canary Litecoin ETF (NASDAQ: LTCC) launched in late 2025, providing institutional access to LTC. However, the ETF has seen minimal inflows—five consecutive days of zero new investment in early January—suggesting institutions aren’t yet buying the digital silver narrative despite physical silver’s performance.
The upcoming LitVM Layer-2 smart contract platform, scheduled for Q1 2026 testnet launch, could provide a catalyst. But Litecoin faces an identity crisis: in a market with hundreds of competing chains, being “Bitcoin but faster” no longer differentiates. Silver’s appeal is its irreplaceable industrial utility; Litecoin must prove comparable indispensability.
What This Means for Crypto Investors
The silver-crypto divergence carries several implications for digital asset portfolios:
Short-term: Bitcoin’s resilience during the Venezuela crisis—holding steady while traditional markets panicked—suggests crypto is developing institutional holding patterns distinct from pure speculation. But it’s not yet capturing safe-haven flows during acute geopolitical stress.
Medium-term: Some analysts argue liquidity currently flowing into precious metals will eventually rotate into crypto. “This liquidity will rotate to Bitcoin and crypto in 2026,” predicted one analyst, noting that Bitcoin can absorb rising liquidity without disrupting the broader economy the way metals do.
Long-term: The “digital gold” thesis isn’t dead—just delayed. Bitcoin’s correlation with tech stocks and risk assets may fade as the market matures. BlackRock’s head of digital assets has called recession “a big catalyst for Bitcoin,” noting it benefits from increased fiscal spending and lower rates typical of downturns.
The Bottom Line
Silver breaking $90 while Bitcoin languishes 30% below its highs represents a verdict on current market preferences. Investors facing geopolitical chaos, inflation uncertainty, and currency debasement chose the asset with 5,000 years of monetary history over the one with 15 years.
But verdicts can be appealed. Bitcoin’s institutional infrastructure—ETFs holding 6.5% of supply, corporate treasuries accumulating, and regulatory clarity emerging via the CLARITY Act—didn’t exist during previous precious metals rallies. The question isn’t whether crypto can compete with precious metals as a store of value, but when market conditions allow that competition to play out.
For now, silver’s message is clear: when safety matters most, physical beats digital. Whether that changes depends on crypto proving it can absorb safe-haven flows during the next crisis—not just survive them.
Reported by BlokchainFeed's research team — crypto journalists and market analysts with 50+ years combined experience covering blockchain and digital assets.
Meet Blok →